GOP Contenders Agree to Agree

[caption id="attachment_1138" align="alignnone" width="480" caption="From left, Peter Schiff, Linda McMahon and Rob Simmons at the Lincoln Theater Tuesday night. (John Woike/Hartford Courant)"][/caption] It wasn't a wrestling ring, but if it was, the three GOP candidates for U.S. Senate seat would have made a great tag-team. In a televised debate at Lincoln Theater Monday, former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment Linda McMahon and investor Peter Schiff found little to argue about on issues. McMahon and Schiff took Simmons to task during part of the debate, both titling themselves as non-career politicians, referring to Simmons' years in Congress. "I am not a politician," Schiff said in his closing remarks. "It's about time some of our career politicians lost their jobs." On job creation, the candidates argued in favor of small business and free enterprise-- a term that largely became the buzzword of the evening. "I would not recommend lawsuits to create jobs," Simmons said in his response to the first question posed. This referenced Monday night's debate when Merrick Alpert knocked Attorney General and frontrunner for the Democrats Richard Blumenthal's claim that lawsuits helped put businesses on even grounds. "If you create jobs, those people pay income tax," McMahon said. "They add to the economy." Schiff said, "Government inhibits job creation" arguing for lower taxes on small businesses. On foreign policy, in regards to Iran, the candidates all agreed that the nation is a threat. "Iran is a rogue nation," McMahon said. She said the only way to deal with the threat is with sanctions and the help of allies. Schiff called Iran a "serious threat" and that he wanted to stop nuclear proliferation. Simmons said using Special Operations forces and C.I.A. operatives would be put to good use in Iran. McMahon's days in wrestling appeared to come out a little bit when she joked that she would come to Washington, set up a wrestling ring and "lay the 'smack down'" in Congress. Simmons is the frontrunner for the GOP, but is trounced in the general election polls by Blumenthal. A Rasmussen poll taken in February has Blumenthal leading by 19 percent, 54 percent to 35.
  • Myer Rickless

    Peter is the clear choice for Connecticut’s next Senator. Peter has a track record for being right for over a decade. Go watch his 2006 speech to the western regional mortgage bankers association in Las Vegas, telling them EXACTLY what would happen. The more you look into the Peter the more you will see that he is the only man who can get the job done for Connecticut. Simmons is just another politician who will tell you whatever he thinks you want to hear. Peter wont tell you what you want to hear he’ll tell you what you must hear- the truth. McMahon is trying to buy an election and if you watch some of Peter’s speeches on Youtube (there are thousands- I’ve watched almost every single one of them) you will see that she stole a number of Peter’s positions verbatim. McMahon’s line about how she’s not going to run for re-election is Peter’s line exactly, then she even butchered the position by saying 5 mins later that she wouldn’t serve more than 2 terms. Which is it Linda? Peter has said consistently that he would only serve one term. Research Peter and you will see that he is the clear choice for Connecticut.

  • Matthew

    Just finished watching the debate. I was supporting Linda Mcmahon and I did like her in the debates.

    Although I was intrigued by Peter Schiff and after researching him on Youtube, I’m blown away. I’m so exited to support him for Senate, sorry Linda =( (still love you though)

    I’m looking forward to seeing more debate about the monetary policy and the economy considering in my opinion is the most important issue

    Here is a video to prove Peter Schiff’s claims about accurately predicting the housing crash, banking crash and stock market crash… And not just predicting the crashes but he laid out exactly what the government response would be and why that wouldn’t work.

    Peter Shiff was right
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq1N70vym1g

  • Mike

    Peter Schiff really “wowed” me in this debate! This man needs to be CT’s next senator!

  • David

    Do your HW. Schiff has not strayed. He tells the truth and has been right time and time again. He worked for the legendary Ron Paul, and is a true man of history and common sense. He is a non-bull$hitter and not a liar.
    He and Ron Paul have helped to cure my apathy (I’m 21). From one American to another I ask you to please at the very least research him online and consider voting for him in this upcoming primary and general election.

    Linda and Rob are RINOs.

  • Jim McClarin

    Simmons was rather blah and McMahon seemed out of her element. I haven’t seen Blumenthal speak but if he’s any good, the Republicans will need to nominate someone with a spark of vitality to oppose him. That would have to be Peter Schiff.

advertisement

advertisement

Also in News